Chat with us, powered by LiveChat public health | acewriters
+1(978)310-4246 credencewriters@gmail.com
  

****attached documents: an example template provided by professor**** dba doctoral study***The Scholar-Practitioner Projects build on each other. The work you do in Part 1 (attached document application 5) which feeds the development of Part 2 ( attached document application 7). Parts 1 and 2 are used for Part 3.For your final written assignment, you refine and develop your Public Health Leadership Theory based on leadership theories and a systems approach learned in this course. For this Assignment, your theory should reflect Instructor feedback, researched studies, introspection, innovation, and literature analysis.The Assignment (15–20 pages):Section 1 — Abstract and Introduction (1–2 pages)Section 2 — Revised Literature Review and Problem Statement (5–7 pages):Literature Review to include:A synthesis of the literature of 15–20 peer reviewed, scholarly resourcesA description of theoretical gaps in the researchProblem Statement to include:An explanation of the specific problem that addresses identified gaps within the literatureAn explanation of how your problem statement incorporates implications for positive social change.Section 3 — Personal Public Health Leadership Theory (2–3 pages):An articulation of your personal Public Health Leadership TheorySection 4 — Revised Visual Representation of Your Public Health Leadership Theory (3–4 pages):Your visual representation should include:Your personal Public Health Leadership Theory to address the gaps identified in the literatureA visual representation of the theory (e.g. table, graph, matrix)A explanation on how the theory addresses the literature gap identified in Week 5A description of how your theory incorporates aspects of systems thinkingSection 5 — Empirical Evaluation Plan for a Public Health Leadership Theory (3–4 pages):You will assess if the newly developed leadership theory addresses the problem you have been working on. What methodological steps will you use? How will you collect data? Suggestion – start with how theories in our text are evaluated. It does not have to be detailed, but it must include the methods, measures and analytic techniques.If the assignments are done correctly, there should be an alignment from the topic of choice to the evaluation:The topic is researched in the literatureThe literature review points out a theoretical gap that needs to be addressed by leadershipThe gap is turned into a problem statementA leadership theory to address the problem proposedThe theory is depicted in a visual; and finallyAn evaluation plan describes how the newly developed theory resolves the problem identified in the literatureTo further help, examples (Two final projects – permission given to post) are located in the Doc Sharing area for this weekSection 6 — Conclusion (1–2 pages)Section 7 — ReferencesAn APA-formatted reference list of 15–20 peer-reviewed, scholarly journalsRESOURCESNahavandi, A. (2014). The art and science of leadership (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Chapter 1, “Definition and Significance of Leadership”Chapter 6, “Current Era in Leadership”Chapter 7, “Other Leadership Perspectives”Chapter 9, “Leading Change”Chapter 10, “Developing Leaders”Koh, H. (2009). Fostering public health leadership. Journal of Public Health, 31(2), 199–201.
app5cherryt.odt

dba_doctoral_study_template_apa_6.doc

app7tcherry.odt

Unformatted Attachment Preview

PUBH 8400: Leadership and System Thinking
Tamillia Cherry
Fall Quarter
Walden University
October 2, 2017
Introduction
Public health is basically about ensuring the health and prosperity of communities and in
addition enhancing the communities through infection counteractive action, instruction, and open
arrangement advancement (Ham, 2003). Public health administration is, consequently, a standout
amongst the most basic ranges in public health since it helps in encouraging public health by advancing
practices aimed at upgrading public health. There are a few basic patterns in public health leadership
today, and sound open leaders must be all around so as to manage issues of people in general inside any
given setting. Creating superb initiative aptitudes is subsequently key in managing some normal
patterns that are influencing public health today (Ham, 2003).
The public health management has an essential part to play considering the present and future
changes in the field of social insurance. The progressions make openings and difficulties to these
leaders and may affect either emphatically or contrarily later on the soundness of groups. A portion of
the normal patterns that make difficulties to them incorporate maturing of the populace, the changing
human services needs of people, changing examples in the racial synthesis with differed social
insurance needs, changes in medicinal services conveyance frameworks, advancing necessities in
public health workforce, and a blast of rising social insurance advancements (Ham, 2003). This writing
audit will, accordingly, concentrate on assessing public health administration concerning the changing
medicinal services needs of people
Problem statement
The healthcare services conveyance framework has experienced a considerable measure of
changes, and the leaders are required to champion the progressions by incorporating such changes
inside the setting of open authority. These progressions may not support the leaders since a few
changes are fixated on frameworks and innovation that public health leadership will be unable to have
the required aptitudes and mastery to encourage or embrace inside the public health framework. The
adjustments in the delivery framework are gone for taking and meeting the changing human services
needs of people. These developing needs correspondingly make a test to the leaders as they are
required to give health administrations customized to the shifted needs of individuals.
Literature review
Lukas et al. (2007) in their article titled ‘transformational change in healthcare delivery system”
contends that five key components are basic for a fruitful change of patient care inside the public health
framework. One of the five components specified in the article is an initiative sense of duty regarding
quality. From their point of view, a compelling initiative in the public health is the capacity of a leader
to accomplish consistency in meeting the changing needs of patients by adjusting the hierarchical
objectives to the general advancing needs of patients. The five components said by Lukas et al. (2007)
in the article drive change inside the public health framework by building up an administration culture
that mirrors the changing needs of patients and the human services conveyance framework as a rule.
Human services experts and public health leaders can extensively conceptualize status for
change in the general wellbeing framework. Stop et al. (2010) characterizes status for change inside the
public health framework as the level of arrangement to which the members are by and large and
independently arranged and roused to grasp the change. In such manner, general wellbeing pioneers
must be prepared to manage the difficulties of the changing needs of patients inside the public health
framework. Stop et al. (2010) states that leaders in medicinal services delivery frameworks are faced
with the test of actualizing the different changes in social insurance practice and conveyance
framework. The contention raised by these analysts is that these leaders should grasp a status to
actualize the different changes inside the social insurance framework that made the two open doors and
difficulties to them.
Hartley and Benington, (2011) assesses the current patterns in administration, considering, and
activity, in their investigation; they contend that public health leadership is a dynamic reaction that
spotlights on grasping the human services needs of groups. In their contention, authority is a structure
that coordinates the estimations of groups through evaluating the patterns and changing human services
needs of groups as a rule. The two focuses their initiative contention on Warwick 6 C authority
structure. The structure, consequently, gives a manual for general wellbeing pioneers by enabling them
to see the changing needs human services needs of groups not as a weight but rather as a chance to
actualize the different changes in the social insurance conveyance framework that can help in meeting
the rising movements in the health needs of groups.
Ham (2003) concentrates on enhancing the execution of health administrations through
compelling clinical health authority inside the general wellbeing. Public health leaders consequently
have the sole obligation regarding guaranteeing quality and dependable social insurance inside the
general human services framework. Change of execution in the medicinal services framework as a
matter of first importance require powerful initiative that stems from both clinical and the whole
general human services framework as confirmed by Ham (2003). Inside the setting of the general
population social insurance framework, changes in view of thoughts, for example, oversaw rivalry and
incorporated care must be grasped to meet the changing needs of patients inside the human services
condition.
As supported by Rowitz (2013), public health functions across the association and for this
situation, trans-hierarchical abilities are basic in encouraging powerful change inside the medicinal
services delivery framework. In his point of view, he noticed that public health leaders hone their
public health administration inside a group setting and for this situation, they are entrusted with a part
of approving group esteems that advance the changing needs in health among groups. These leaders
must, in this way, focus on long-lasting discovering that acknowledges the estimations of public health
and elevates approaches to deal with the changing social insurance needs of groups. Rowitz (2013)
gives new knowledge into the comprehension of changing medicinal services needs of groups and the
different authority abilities that leaders must embrace to cultivate viable social insurance results inside
the setting of public health. They must be pioneers paying little respect to the substances they look over
the span of their work. They should settle on a very much educated choice of molding the social
insurance framework and grasping the human services needs of groups.
Plochg, Klazinga, and Starfield, (2009) note that expert associations and health frameworks
never again mirrors the changing social insurance needs of people inside groups. The development of
necessities is caused by the developing number of complex and constantly sick patients. It is, thus, vital
for the key partners to start basic changes aimed at incorporating the changing needs of patients inside
the public health framework. They continue to take note of that the medicinal health leaders bolstered
by wellbeing approach creators can start programs should go for encouraging powerful health result in
groups. This is done through characterizing and sorting the health needs of groups and arranging claim
to fame spaces around the requirements of the populace in order to guarantee that the human services
framework addresses the issues of the group.
Epping-Jordan et al. (2004) hold that incessant conditions are progressively getting to be public
health challenge for the concerned leaders. It is an essential worry for leaders all through the world. In
light of this larger test, the WHO has proposed a constant care display that goes for growing the group
and approach perspectives to enhance medicinal services and ceaseless states of people (Epping-Jordan
et al., 2004). In an offer to cultivate viable intercession for an unending condition in public health, Koh
and Jacobson (2009) argue that the gigantic test lies outside the ability to control of any single
specialist but instead consolidated exertion fixated on viable administration and wide societal level
changes. The changing human services needs are in this way because of the rising idea of perpetual
health conditions that confines the limit of the present social insurance framework. Popescu and
Predescu, (2016) in this manner proposes a practical authority and administration in public health that
grasps the need to change the strategies of managing these difficulties.
Popescu and Predescu, (2016) contend that public health leaders ought to be focused on the
human services needs of the populace. Medicinal services leaders should concentrate their initiative on
conveying human services benefits that grasp the different social insurance challenges realized by the
rising incessant health care conditions. The two proposes important aptitudes and capacities that are
expected of public health leaders in fulfilling the social insurance needs of people within the setup.
Taking everything into account, Saleh, Williams, and Balougan, (2004) hold that the setting of
public health requires sound leadership and management that can empower the public health leader to
react to the changing needs of people. There a few threats that are progressively posturing difficulties
to patients and in this manner causing them to change their social insurance needs. In such manner,
healthcare leadership must encourage viable public health management that can empower public health
leadership reacts proficiently to the changing medicinal services needs of groups.
Reference
Epping-Jordan, J. E., Pruitt, S. D., Bengoa, R., & Wagner, E. H. (2004). Improving the quality of health
care for chronic conditions. Quality and safety in health care, 13(4), 299-305.
Ham, C. (2003). Improving the performance of health services: the role of clinical leadership. The
Lancet, 361(9373), 1978-1980.
Hartley, J., & Benington, J. (2011). Recent trends in leadership thinking and action in the public and
voluntary service sectors. London: The King’s Fund.
Holt, D. T., Helfrich, C. D., Hall, C. G., & Weiner, B. J. (2010). Are you ready? How health
professionals can comprehensively conceptualize readiness for change. Journal of general
internal medicine, 25, 50-55.
Koh, H. K., & Jacobson, M. (2009). Fostering public health leadership. Journal of public health, 31(2),
199-201.
Lukas, C. V., Holmes, S. K., Cohen, A. B., Restuccia, J., Cramer, I. E., Shwartz, M., & Charns, M. P.
(2007). Transformational change in health care systems: an organizational model. Health care
management review, 32(4), 309-320.
Plochg, T., Klazinga, N. S., & Starfield, B. (2009). Transforming medical professionalism to fit
changing health needs. BMC medicine, 7(1), 64.
Popescu, G. H., & Predescu, V. (2016). The role of leadership in public health. American Journal of
Medical Research, 3(1), 273-273.
Rowitz, L. (2013). Public health leadership. Jones & Bartlett Publishers.
Saleh, S. S., Williams, D., & Balougan, M. (2004). Evaluating the effectiveness of public health
leadership training: the NEPHLI experience. American journal of public health, 94(7).
Abstract
[Doctoral Study Title]
by
[your official name]
MS, [university], 20XX
BS, [university], 20XX
Doctoral Study Submitted in Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements for the Degree of
Doctor of Business Administration
Walden University
[last month of quarter you plan to graduate] 20XX
Abstract
Insert abstract here; it should be no more than one page. Abstract text must be doublespaced with no paragraph breaks. Describe the overall research problem being addressed
in the first couple of sentences and indicate why it is important (e.g., who would care if
the problem is solved). You can include a general introduction of the issue in the first
sentence, but you need to move to a clear statement of the research problem being
addressed. Identify the purpose and theoretical foundations, if appropriate, summarize the
key research question(s), and briefly describe the overall research design, methods and
data analytic procedures. Identify the key results, 1 or 2 conclusions, and
recommendations that capture the heart of the research. Conclude with a statement on the
implications for positive social change. Here are some form and style tips: (a) Limit the
abstract to one typed page; (b) maintain the scholarly language used throughout the
doctoral study; (c) keep the abstract concise, accurate, and readable; (d) use correct
English; (e) ensure each sentence adds value to the reader’s understanding of the
research; and (f) use the full name of any acronym and include the acronym in
parentheses. Do not include references or citations in the abstract. Per APA style, unless
at the start of a sentence, use numerals in the abstract.
[Doctoral Study Title]
by
[your official name]
MS, [university], 20XX
BS, [university], 20XX
Doctoral Study Submitted in Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements for the Degree of
Doctor of Business Administration
Walden University
[last month of quarter you plan to graduate] 20XX
Dedication
This is an optional page for a dedication. If you include a dedication, use regular
paragraph spacing as shown here (not centered, italicized, or otherwise formatted). The
acknowledgments should not exceed one page.
Acknowledgments
This is an optional page for acknowledgments. It is a nice place to thank the
faculty, family members, and friends who have helped you reach this point in your
academic career. The acknowledgments should not exceed one page.
No page number appears on any of the pages up to this point. If you do not wish
to include this page, delete the heading and the body text.
Table of Contents
List of Tables ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… iv
List of Figures ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….v
Section 1: Foundation of the Study…………………………………………………………………………..1
Background of the Problem ……………………………………………………………………………….1
Problem Statement ……………………………………………………………………………………………1
Purpose Statement …………………………………………………………………………………………….2
Nature of the Study …………………………………………………………………………………………..3
Research Question ……………………………………………………………………………………………3
Hypotheses ………………………………………………………………………………………………………4
Theoretical or Conceptual Framework ………………………………………………………………..4
Definition of Terms…………………………………………………………………………………………..4
Assumptions, Limitations, and Delimitations ……………………………………………………….5
Assumptions……………………………………………………………………………………………… 5
Limitations ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 5
Delimitations …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 5
Significance of the Study …………………………………………………………………………………..5
Reduction of Gaps……………………………………………………………………………………… 5
Implications for Social Change ……………………………………………………………………. 5
A Review of the Professional and Academic Literature …………………………………………5
Transition and Summary ……………………………………………………………………………………7
Section 2: The Project …………………………………………………………………………………………….8
i
Purpose Statement …………………………………………………………………………………………….8
Role of the Researcher ………………………………………………………………………………………8
Participants ………………………………………………………………………………………………………8
Research Method and Design …………………………………………………………………………….8
Method …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 9
Research Design………………………………………………………………………………………… 9
Population and Sampling …………………………………………………………………………………..9
Data Collection ………………………………………………………………………………………………10
Instruments ……………………………………………………………………………………………… 10
Data Collection Technique ……………………………………………………………………….. 11
Data Organization Techniques …………………………………………………………………… 11
Data Analysis Technique …………………………………………………………………………………11
Reliability and Validity ……………………………………………………………………………………12
Reliability……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 12
Validity ………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 12
Transition and Summary ………………………………………………………………………………….12
Section 3: Application to Professional Practice and Implications for Change ………………13
Overview of Study ………………………………………………………………………………………….13
Presentation of the Findings……………………………………………………………………………..13
Applications to Professional Practice ………………………………………………………………..13
Implications for Social Change …………………………………………………………………………14
Recommendations for Action …………………………………………………………………………..14
ii
Recommendations for Further Study …………………………………………………………………14
Reflections …………………………………………………………………………………………………….14
Summary and Study Conclusions ……………………………………………………………………..14
References …………………………………………………………………………………………………………..15
Appendix A: Title of Appendix …
Purchase answer to see full
attachment

error: Content is protected !!